[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241206082058.4a185982@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 08:20:58 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, "Andrii
Nakryiko" <andrii@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Toke
Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>, "Maciej
Fijalkowski" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Stanislav Fomichev
<sdf@...ichev.me>, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
<nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 09/10] page_pool: allow mixing PPs within
one bulk
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:49:18 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > nit: netmem_pp is not a great name. Ain't nothing especially netmem
> > about it, it's just the _current_ page pool.
>
> It's the page_pool of the @netmem we're processing on this iteration.
> "This netmem's PP" => netmem_pp.
> Current page_pool which we'll use for recycling is @pool.
Heh, yes, I guess there are levels to current..ness :)
Maybe instead of current the one we're servicing could be called tgt_pp
and the one from iterator just pp? No big deal either way, tho, this is
very nit picky and subjective...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists