[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241206-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v5-1-ed566c2f27e8@rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:52:11 -0800
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5] riscv: selftests: Fix warnings pointer masking test
When compiling the pointer masking tests with -Wall this warning
is present:
pointer_masking.c: In function ‘test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl’:
pointer_masking.c:203:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’
declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
203 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0); |
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pointer_masking.c:208:9: warning:
ignoring return value of ‘pwrite’ declared with attribute
‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
208 | pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0);
I came across this on riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc (Ubuntu
11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04).
Fix this by checking that the number of bytes written equal the expected
number of bytes written.
Fixes: 7470b5afd150 ("riscv: selftests: Add a pointer masking test")
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
---
Changes in v5:
- No longer skip second pwrite if first one fails
- Use wrapper function instead of goto (Drew)
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241205-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v4-1-0c77eb725486@rivosinc.com
Changes in v4:
- Skip sysctl_enabled test if first pwrite failed
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241205-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v3-1-5c28b0f9640d@rivosinc.com
Changes in v3:
- Fix sysctl enabled test case (Drew/Alex)
- Move pwrite err condition into goto (Drew)
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v2-1-1bf0c5095f58@rivosinc.com
Changes in v2:
- I had ret != 2 for testing, I changed it to be ret != 1.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-v1-1-ea1e9665ce7a@rivosinc.com
---
.../testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c
index dee41b7ee3e3..50c4d1bc7570 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/abi/pointer_masking.c
@@ -185,8 +185,20 @@ static void test_fork_exec(void)
}
}
+static bool pwrite_wrapper(int fd, void *buf, size_t count, const char *msg)
+{
+ int ret = pwrite(fd, buf, count, 0);
+
+ if (ret != count) {
+ ksft_perror(msg);
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void)
{
+ char *err_pwrite_msg = "failed to write to /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr_disabled\n";
char value;
int fd;
@@ -200,14 +212,12 @@ static void test_tagged_addr_abi_sysctl(void)
}
value = '1';
- pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0);
- ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == -EINVAL,
- "sysctl disabled\n");
+ if (!pwrite_wrapper(fd, &value, 1, "write '1'"))
+ ksft_test_result_fail(err_pwrite_msg);
value = '0';
- pwrite(fd, &value, 1, 0);
- ksft_test_result(set_tagged_addr_ctrl(min_pmlen, true) == 0,
- "sysctl enabled\n");
+ if (!pwrite_wrapper(fd, &value, 1, "write '0'"))
+ ksft_test_result_fail(err_pwrite_msg);
set_tagged_addr_ctrl(0, false);
---
base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37
change-id: 20241204-fix_warnings_pointer_masking_tests-3860e4f35429
--
- Charlie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists