[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c873a9c3-df0d-423b-b3f5-452c6b9de506@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:58:59 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"kan.liang@...ux.intel.com" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/cpu: Replace PEBS use of 'x86_cpu_desc' use with
'x86_cpu_id'
On 12/6/24 11:55, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> The 'x86_cpu_desc' and 'x86_cpu_id' structures are very similar.
>> Reduce duplicate infrastructure by moving the few users of
>> 'x86_cpu_id' to the much more common variant.
> This paragraph is backwards. You are moving 'x86_cpu_desc to 'x86_cpu_id.
Thanks for catching that, Tony! Fixed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists