[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ser0ec7l.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 22:25:02 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Anna-Maria Behnsen"
<anna-maria@...utronix.de>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Alex Gaynor"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno
Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Lyude Paul" <lyude@...hat.com>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/14] rust: alloc: add `Box::into_pin`
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:33:02PM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> Add an associated function to convert a `Box<T>` into a `Pin<Box<T>>`.
>
> What do you need this function for?
>
> There is an `impl<T, A> From<Box<T, A>> for Pin<Box<T, A>>` already.
>
I didn't realize, but that could work as well. I was rebasing this
series from before we did our own `Box`, and rust `Box` has this method,
which I was using.
At any rate, I think it would make sense to have `into_pin` as well as
the `From` impl, to match the standard library. We could always
implement one in terms of the other.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists