[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1JnL9sgsJ+8wNxm@cse-cd02-lnx.ap.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:53:35 +0800
From: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
<quic_zhgao@...cinc.com>, <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Correctly set the load for the
regulator
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 08:44:37PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:50:29PM +0800, Yuanjie Yang wrote:
> > Qualcomm regulator supports two power supply modes: HPM and LPM.
> > Currently, the sdhci-msm.c driver does not set the load to adjust
> > the current for eMMC and SD. Therefore, if the regulator set load
> > in LPM state, it will lead to the inability to properly initialize
> > eMMC and SD.
> >
> > Set the correct regulator current for eMMC and SD to ensure that the
> > device can work normally even when the regulator is in LPM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Add enum msm_reg_type to optimize the code
> > - Delete redundant emmc type judgment
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20241122075048.2006894-1-quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com/
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > index e00208535bd1..fc13ef60ab61 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> > @@ -134,9 +134,22 @@
> > /* Timeout value to avoid infinite waiting for pwr_irq */
> > #define MSM_PWR_IRQ_TIMEOUT_MS 5000
> >
> > +/* Max load for eMMC Vdd supply */
> > +#define MMC_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA 570000
> > +
> > /* Max load for eMMC Vdd-io supply */
> > #define MMC_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA 325000
> >
> > +/* Max load for SD Vdd supply */
> > +#define SD_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA 800000
> > +
> > +/* Max load for SD Vdd-io supply */
> > +#define SD_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA 22000
> > +
> > +#define MAX_MMC_SD_VMMC_LOAD_UA max(MMC_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA, SD_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA)
> > +
> > +#define MAX_MMC_SD_VQMMC_LOAD_UA max(MMC_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA, SD_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA)
> > +
> > #define msm_host_readl(msm_host, host, offset) \
> > msm_host->var_ops->msm_readl_relaxed(host, offset)
> >
> > @@ -147,6 +160,11 @@
> > #define CQHCI_VENDOR_CFG1 0xA00
> > #define CQHCI_VENDOR_DIS_RST_ON_CQ_EN (0x3 << 13)
> >
> > +enum msm_reg_type {
> > + VMMC_REGULATOR,
> > + VQMMC_REGULATOR,
>
> Please drop enum completely, then...
Thanks, I will drop enum in next version.
> > +};
> > +
> > struct sdhci_msm_offset {
> > u32 core_hc_mode;
> > u32 core_mci_data_cnt;
> > @@ -1403,11 +1421,71 @@ static int sdhci_msm_set_pincfg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, bool level)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > +static int sdhci_msm_get_regulator_load(struct mmc_host *mmc, int max_current,
> > + enum msm_reg_type type)
> > +{
> > + int load = 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * When eMMC and SD are powered on for the first time, select a higher
> > + * current value from the corresponding current for eMMC and SD to
> > + * ensure that the eMMC and SD cards start up properly and complete
> > + * initialization. After the initialization process is finished, use
> > + * the corresponding current to set the eMMC and SD to ensure the
> > + * normal work of the device.
> > + */
> > +
> > + if (!mmc->card)
> > + return max_current;
> > +
> > + if (mmc_card_mmc(mmc->card))
> > + load = (type == VMMC_REGULATOR) ? MMC_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA : MMC_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA;
> > + else if (mmc_card_sd(mmc->card))
> > + load = (type == VMMC_REGULATOR) ? SD_VMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA : SD_VQMMC_MAX_LOAD_UA;
>
> ... split this into two functions, one for vmmc and another one for
> vqmmc...
Thanks, I will split this funcution into two function in next version.
> > +
> > + return load;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int msm_config_regulator_load(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, struct mmc_host *mmc,
> > + bool hpm, int max_current, enum msm_reg_type type)
>
> Then this becomes two functions too, each of those can be inlined in the
> proper place.
Thanks, I will fix it in next version.
>
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + int load = 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * After the initialization process is finished, Once the type of card
> > + * is determined, only set the corresponding current for SD and eMMC.
> > + */
> > +
> > + if (mmc->card && !(mmc_card_mmc(mmc->card) || mmc_card_sd(mmc->card)))
> > + return 0;
>
> This goes into sdhci_msm_get_regulator_load().
Thanks, I will optimize this code in next patch.
> > +
> > + if (hpm)
> > + load = sdhci_msm_get_regulator_load(mmc, max_current, type);
> > +
> > + if (type == VMMC_REGULATOR)
> > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, load);
> > + else
> > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, load);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: set load failed: %d\n",
> > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> > + struct mmc_host *mmc, bool hpm)
> > {
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc))
> > return 0;
> >
> > + ret = msm_config_regulator_load(msm_host, mmc, hpm,
> > + MAX_MMC_SD_VMMC_LOAD_UA, VMMC_REGULATOR);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > return mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, mmc->ios.vdd);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1435,6 +1513,15 @@ static int msm_toggle_vqmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> > goto out;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + ret = msm_config_regulator_load(msm_host, mmc, level,
> > + MAX_MMC_SD_VQMMC_LOAD_UA, VQMMC_REGULATOR);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: vqmmc set regulator load failed: %d\n",
> > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
> > } else {
> > ret = regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
> > @@ -1642,7 +1729,8 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
> > }
> >
> > if (pwr_state) {
> > - ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(mmc);
> > + ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(msm_host, mmc,
> > + pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON);
> > if (!ret)
> > ret = sdhci_msm_set_vqmmc(msm_host, mmc,
> > pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON);
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Thanks,
Yuanjie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists