lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1Kg6yIQlJYAB6sq@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:59:55 +0800
From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen
	<dave.hansen@...el.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,mm: also remove local CPU from mm_cpumask if stale

hi, Rik van Riel,

On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 10:46:30AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:43:24 +0800
> kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > besides the performance report
> > "[tip:x86/mm] [x86/mm/tlb]  209954cbc7:  will-it-scale.per_thread_ops 13.2% regression"
> > in
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202411282207.6bd28eae-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> Anxiously awaiting the bot to get around to v3 or v4 of that patch,
> on the extra-large 2 socket system ;)
>  
> > we now also observed a WARNING from another test. the issue doesn't always
> > happen, so we run it more to make sure the parent keep clean.
> 
> Thank you for spotting this corner case, too!
> 
> The warning appears to be fairly harmless, and luckily also easy
> to fix.

below patch fixes the WARNING in our tests.

Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>

our bot applied the patch as below:

fbf932edb3630 x86,mm: also remove local CPU from mm_cpumask if stale   <-----
2815a56e4b725 (tip/x86/mm) x86/mm/tlb: Add tracepoint for TLB flush IPI to stale CPU
209954cbc7d0c x86/mm/tlb: Update mm_cpumask lazily
7e33001b8b9a7 x86/mm/tlb: Put cpumask_test_cpu() check in switch_mm_irqs_off() under CONFIG_DEBUG_VM

now issue is clean on fbf932edb3630

=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_ssd/nr_task/priority/rootfs/runtime/tbox_group/test/testcase/thp_defrag/thp_enabled:
  gcc-12/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/1/32/1/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/300/lkp-icl-2sp4/swap-w-seq/vm-scalability/always/always

7e33001b8b9a7806 209954cbc7d0ce1a190fc725d20 fbf932edb3630024b60b22df596
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
       fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs  %reproduction    fail:runs
           |             |             |             |             |
           :50          58%          29:50           0%            :50    dmesg.RIP:flush_tlb_func
           :50          58%          29:50           0%            :50    dmesg.WARNING:at_arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:#flush_tlb_func


> 
> ---8<---
> 
> From 5b5d1d548fbe07b415ba9e80a2f60deed5aead62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:20:28 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86,mm: also remove local CPU from mm_cpumask if stale
> 
> The code in flush_tlb_func that removes a remote CPU from the
> cpumask if it is no longer running the target mm is also needed
> on the originating CPU of a TLB flush, now that CPUs are no
> longer cleared from the mm_cpumask at context switch time.
> 
> Flushing the TLB when we are not running the target mm is
> harmless, because the CPU's tlb_gen only gets updated to
> match the mm_tlb_gen, but it does hit this warning:
> 
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(local_tlb_gen > mm_tlb_gen);
> 
> [ 210.343902][ T4668] WARNING: CPU: 38 PID: 4668 at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:815 flush_tlb_func (arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:815)
> 
> Removing both local and remote CPUs from the mm_cpumask
> when doing a flush for a not currently loaded mm avoids
> that warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202412051551.690e9656-lkp@intel.com
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> index 0507a6773a37..458a5d5be594 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -756,13 +756,13 @@ static void flush_tlb_func(void *info)
>  	if (!local) {
>  		inc_irq_stat(irq_tlb_count);
>  		count_vm_tlb_event(NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED);
> +	}
>  
> -		/* Can only happen on remote CPUs */
> -		if (f->mm && f->mm != loaded_mm) {
> -			cpumask_clear_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(f->mm));
> -			trace_tlb_flush(TLB_REMOTE_WRONG_CPU, 0);
> -			return;
> -		}
> +	/* The CPU was left in the mm_cpumask of the target mm. Clear it. */
> +	if (f->mm && f->mm != loaded_mm) {
> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), mm_cpumask(f->mm));
> +		trace_tlb_flush(TLB_REMOTE_WRONG_CPU, 0);
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (unlikely(loaded_mm == &init_mm))
> -- 
> 2.47.0
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ