[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3391fbff2c69be230d368c68d215be4@paul-moore.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 19:22:37 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@...hat.com>, audit@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eparis@...hat.com, rgb@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: fix suffixed '/' filename matching in __audit_inode_child()
On Nov 22, 2024 Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> When the user specifies a directory to delete with the suffix '/',
> the audit record fails to collect the filename, resulting in the
> following logs:
>
> type=PATH msg=audit(10/30/2024 14:11:17.796:6304) : item=2 name=(null)
> type=PATH msg=audit(10/30/2024 14:11:17.796:6304) : item=1 name=(null)
>
> It happens because the value of the variables dname, and n->name->name
> in __audit_inode_child() differ only by the suffix '/'. This commit
> treats this corner case by handling pathname's trailing slashes in
> audit_compare_dname_path().
>
> Steps to reproduce the issue:
>
> # auditctl -w /tmp
> $ mkdir /tmp/foo
> $ rm -r /tmp/foo/
> # ausearch -i | grep PATH | tail -3
>
> The first version of this patch was based on a GitHub patch/PR by
> user @hqh2010 [1].
>
> Link: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/pull/148 [1]
>
> Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@...hat.com>
> ---
> v2: handling pathname's trailing slashes in audit_compare_dname_path()
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/audit/20241114040948.GK3387508@ZenIV/T/#t
> ---
> kernel/auditfilter.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Yes, Richard did provide a reviewed-by tag on the v1 patch, but v2 has
enough changes that I don't think we can reasonably carry that forward;
of course Richard re-review this iteration and provide a new tag. I'm
going to remove it for now.
Al never provided an explicit reviewed-by tag; simply commenting on a
patch is not the same as providing a 'Reviewed-by', the reviewer will
provide an explicit 'Reviewed-by' tag in their email. I'm going to
remove Al's tag too.
Other than those issues, I think this looks much better than v1, I'm
going to merge this into audit/dev now, thanks!
> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 470041c49a44..8ddccdb4a2a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -1319,13 +1319,20 @@ int audit_compare_dname_path(const struct qstr *dname, const char *path, int par
> if (pathlen < dlen)
> return 1;
>
> - parentlen = parentlen == AUDIT_NAME_FULL ? parent_len(path) : parentlen;
> - if (pathlen - parentlen != dlen)
> - return 1;
> + if (parentlen == AUDIT_NAME_FULL)
> + parentlen = parent_len(path);
>
> p = path + parentlen;
>
> - return strncmp(p, dname->name, dlen);
> + /* handle trailing slashes */
> + pathlen -= parentlen;
> + while (p[pathlen - 1] == '/')
> + pathlen--;
> +
> + if (pathlen != dlen)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return memcmp(p, dname->name, dlen);
> }
>
> int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
> --
> 2.47.0
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists