lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLghxQ724+aZh4B0UJJ40ut7iS1grs2CAkH-wjWVmt0om7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:10:45 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, 
	ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, 
	gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, 
	a.hindborg@...nel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] rust: miscdevice: Provide accessor to pull out miscdevice::this_device

On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 8:46 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 07:33:09AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Dec 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 06 Dec 2024, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 04:25:18PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > There are situations where a pointer to a `struct device` will become
> > > > > necessary (e.g. for calling into dev_*() functions).  This accessor
> > > > > allows callers to pull this out from the `struct miscdevice`.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  rust/kernel/miscdevice.rs | 9 +++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/miscdevice.rs b/rust/kernel/miscdevice.rs
> > > > > index 7e2a79b3ae26..55340f316006 100644
> > > > > --- a/rust/kernel/miscdevice.rs
> > > > > +++ b/rust/kernel/miscdevice.rs
> > > > > @@ -10,11 +10,13 @@
> > > > >
> > > > >  use crate::{
> > > > >      bindings,
> > > > > +    device::Device,
> > > > >      error::{to_result, Error, Result, VTABLE_DEFAULT_ERROR},
> > > > >      prelude::*,
> > > > >      str::CStr,
> > > > >      types::{ForeignOwnable, Opaque},
> > > > >  };
> > > > > +
> > > > >  use core::{
> > > > >      ffi::{c_int, c_long, c_uint, c_ulong},
> > > > >      marker::PhantomData,
> > > > > @@ -84,6 +86,13 @@ pub fn register(opts: MiscDeviceOptions) -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> {
> > > > >      pub fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::miscdevice {
> > > > >          self.inner.get()
> > > > >      }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    /// Returns a pointer to the current Device
> > > > > +    pub fn device(&self) -> &Device {
> > > > > +        // SAFETY: This is only accessible after a successful register() which always
> > > > > +        // initialises this_device with a valid device.
> > > > > +        unsafe { Device::as_ref((*self.as_raw()).this_device) }
> > > >
> > > > A "raw" pointer that you can do something with without incrementing the
> > > > reference count of it?  Oh wait, no, it's the rust device structure.
> > > > If so, why isn't this calling the get_device() interface instead?  That
> > > > way it's properly incremented and decremented when it "leaves the scope"
> > > > right?
> > > >
> > > > Or am I missing something here as to why that wouldn't work and this is
> > > > the only way to get access to the 'struct device' of this miscdevice?
> > >
> > > Fair point.  I'll speak to Alice.
> >
> > Alice isn't available yet, so I may be talking out of turn at this
> > point, but I just found this is the Device documentation:
> >
> >   /// A `Device` instance represents a valid `struct device` created by the C portion of the kernel.
> >   ///
> >   /// Instances of this type are always reference-counted, that is, a call to `get_device` ensures
> >   /// that the allocation remains valid at least until the matching call to `put_device`.
> >
> > And:
> >
> >   // SAFETY: Instances of `Device` are always reference-counted.
> >
> > Ready for some analysis from this beginner?
> >
> > Since this impl for Device is AlwaysRefCounted, when any references are
> > taken i.e. in the Device::as_ref line above, inc_ref() is implicitly
> > called to increase the refcount.  The same will be true of dec_ref()
> > once it goes out of scope.
> >
> >   // SAFETY: Instances of `Device` are always reference-counted.
> >   unsafe impl crate::types::AlwaysRefCounted for Device {
> >       fn inc_ref(&self) {
> >           // SAFETY: The existence of a shared reference guarantees that the refcount is non-zero.
> >           unsafe { bindings::get_device(self.as_raw()) };
> >       }
> >
> >       unsafe fn dec_ref(obj: ptr::NonNull<Self>) {
> >           // SAFETY: The safety requirements guarantee that the refcount is non-zero.
> >           unsafe { bindings::put_device(obj.cast().as_ptr()) }
> >   }
>
> Ick, really?  So as_ref() implicitly calles inc_ref() and dec_ref()?
> Ah, ok, in digging into AlwaysRefCounted I now see that seems to be
> true.

It doesn't increment the refcount because it uses the reference type
&_ and not the ARef<_> pointer type. References enforce correctness
using the borrow-checker. For example, consider this attempt to UAF:

#[derive(Debug)]
struct Inner {}

struct Outer {
    inner: Inner,
}

impl Outer {
    fn as_ref(&self) -> &Inner {
        &self.inner
    }
}

fn main() {
    let inner;
    {
        let outer = Outer { inner: Inner {} };
        inner = outer.as_ref();
    }
    println!("{:?}", inner);
}

This fails to compile:

error[E0597]: `outer` does not live long enough
  --> src/main.rs:19:17
   |
18 |         let outer = Outer { inner: Inner {} };
   |             ----- binding `outer` declared here
19 |         inner = outer.as_ref();
   |                 ^^^^^ borrowed value does not live long enough
20 |     }
   |     - `outer` dropped here while still borrowed
21 |     println!("{:?}", inner);
   |                      ----- borrow later used here

The same logic applies to the device() accessor. That is, it ensures
that you can only use the pointer to access the `struct device` when
the `struct miscdevice` is still valid, which should be okay.

To grab a refcount, you need the ARef<_> pointer type. Callers can do

let device = ARef::from(miscdevice.device());

and now device is a value of type ARef<Device> which owns a refcount
and drops it when the destructor runs.

Alice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ