[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bc7817c-6044-4999-b901-1b87e88fef42@gaisler.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:19:49 +0100
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
To: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Move va_end() before exit
On 2024-12-04 12:21, liujing wrote:
> [PATCH] sparc: Move va_end() before exit
Please use exit() rather than exit also here. As it is the calls you are
swapping order of and not an implementation perhaps phrase it "Call
va_end()..." or "Move va_end() call..." or something like that. Please
also indicate where this change is happening, not just in sparc.
> This patch makes a minor adjustment by moving the va_end call before
> exit. Since the exit() function terminates the program, any code
> after exit(1) is unreachable thus notexecuted. Placing va_end before
> exit ensures that the va_list is properly cleaned up.
Please also describe how you found this.
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/vdso/vdso2c.c b/arch/sparc/vdso/vdso2c.c
> index dc81240aab6f..372e3330850a 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/vdso/vdso2c.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/vdso/vdso2c.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ static void fail(const char *format, ...)
> vfprintf(stderr, format, ap);
> if (outfilename)
> unlink(outfilename);
> - exit(1);
> va_end(ap);
> + exit(1);
> }
>
> /*
Cheers,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists