| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <173347791397.412.11164164930098434905.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:38:33 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Andrii Nakryiko" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/core] uprobes: Simplify session consumer tracking
The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: e62f2d4927288db7fb1c22914f6aa33a94df0b01
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e62f2d4927288db7fb1c22914f6aa33a94df0b01
Author: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 16:24:14 -08:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:52:01 +01:00
uprobes: Simplify session consumer tracking
In practice, each return_instance will typically contain either zero or
one return_consumer, depending on whether it has any uprobe session
consumer attached or not. It's highly unlikely that more than one uprobe
session consumers will be attached to any given uprobe, so there is no
need to optimize for that case. But the way we currently do memory
allocation and accounting is by pre-allocating the space for 4 session
consumers in contiguous block of memory next to struct return_instance
fixed part. This is unnecessarily wasteful.
This patch changes this to keep struct return_instance fixed-sized with one
pre-allocated return_consumer, while (in a highly unlikely scenario)
allowing for more session consumers in a separate dynamically
allocated and reallocated array.
We also simplify accounting a bit by not maintaining a separate
temporary capacity for consumers array, and, instead, relying on
krealloc() to be a no-op if underlying memory can accommodate a slightly
bigger allocation (but again, it's very uncommon scenario to even have
to do this reallocation).
All this gets rid of ri_size(), simplifies push_consumer() and removes
confusing ri->consumers_cnt re-assignment, while containing this
singular preallocated consumer logic contained within a few simple
preexisting helpers.
Having fixed-sized struct return_instance simplifies and speeds up
return_instance reuse that we ultimately add later in this patch set,
see follow up patches.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206002417.3295533-2-andrii@kernel.org
---
include/linux/uprobes.h | 10 ++++--
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index e0a4c20..1d44997 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -154,12 +154,18 @@ struct return_instance {
unsigned long stack; /* stack pointer */
unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr; /* original return address */
bool chained; /* true, if instance is nested */
- int consumers_cnt;
+ int cons_cnt; /* total number of session consumers */
struct return_instance *next; /* keep as stack */
struct rcu_head rcu;
- struct return_consumer consumers[] __counted_by(consumers_cnt);
+ /* singular pre-allocated return_consumer instance for common case */
+ struct return_consumer consumer;
+ /*
+ * extra return_consumer instances for rare cases of multiple session consumers,
+ * contains (cons_cnt - 1) elements
+ */
+ struct return_consumer *extra_consumers;
} ____cacheline_aligned;
enum rp_check {
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index daf4314..6beac52 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1899,6 +1899,7 @@ static struct return_instance *free_ret_instance(struct return_instance *ri, boo
hprobe_finalize(&ri->hprobe, hstate);
}
+ kfree(ri->extra_consumers);
kfree_rcu(ri, rcu);
return next;
}
@@ -1974,32 +1975,34 @@ static struct uprobe_task *get_utask(void)
return current->utask;
}
-static size_t ri_size(int consumers_cnt)
-{
- struct return_instance *ri;
-
- return sizeof(*ri) + sizeof(ri->consumers[0]) * consumers_cnt;
-}
-
-#define DEF_CNT 4
-
static struct return_instance *alloc_return_instance(void)
{
struct return_instance *ri;
- ri = kzalloc(ri_size(DEF_CNT), GFP_KERNEL);
+ ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ri)
return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
- ri->consumers_cnt = DEF_CNT;
return ri;
}
static struct return_instance *dup_return_instance(struct return_instance *old)
{
- size_t size = ri_size(old->consumers_cnt);
+ struct return_instance *ri;
+
+ ri = kmemdup(old, sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (unlikely(old->cons_cnt > 1)) {
+ ri->extra_consumers = kmemdup(old->extra_consumers,
+ sizeof(ri->extra_consumers[0]) * (old->cons_cnt - 1),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ri->extra_consumers) {
+ kfree(ri);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
- return kmemdup(old, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ return ri;
}
static int dup_utask(struct task_struct *t, struct uprobe_task *o_utask)
@@ -2369,25 +2372,28 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe_rcu(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swb
return uprobe;
}
-static struct return_instance*
-push_consumer(struct return_instance *ri, int idx, __u64 id, __u64 cookie)
+static struct return_instance *push_consumer(struct return_instance *ri, __u64 id, __u64 cookie)
{
+ struct return_consumer *ric;
+
if (unlikely(ri == ZERO_SIZE_PTR))
return ri;
- if (unlikely(idx >= ri->consumers_cnt)) {
- struct return_instance *old_ri = ri;
-
- ri->consumers_cnt += DEF_CNT;
- ri = krealloc(old_ri, ri_size(old_ri->consumers_cnt), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ri) {
- kfree(old_ri);
+ if (unlikely(ri->cons_cnt > 0)) {
+ ric = krealloc(ri->extra_consumers, sizeof(*ric) * ri->cons_cnt, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ric) {
+ kfree(ri->extra_consumers);
+ kfree_rcu(ri, rcu);
return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
}
+ ri->extra_consumers = ric;
}
- ri->consumers[idx].id = id;
- ri->consumers[idx].cookie = cookie;
+ ric = likely(ri->cons_cnt == 0) ? &ri->consumer : &ri->extra_consumers[ri->cons_cnt - 1];
+ ric->id = id;
+ ric->cookie = cookie;
+
+ ri->cons_cnt++;
return ri;
}
@@ -2395,14 +2401,17 @@ static struct return_consumer *
return_consumer_find(struct return_instance *ri, int *iter, int id)
{
struct return_consumer *ric;
- int idx = *iter;
+ int idx;
- for (ric = &ri->consumers[idx]; idx < ri->consumers_cnt; idx++, ric++) {
+ for (idx = *iter; idx < ri->cons_cnt; idx++)
+ {
+ ric = likely(idx == 0) ? &ri->consumer : &ri->extra_consumers[idx - 1];
if (ric->id == id) {
*iter = idx + 1;
return ric;
}
}
+
return NULL;
}
@@ -2416,7 +2425,6 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
bool has_consumers = false, remove = true;
struct return_instance *ri = NULL;
- int push_idx = 0;
current->utask->auprobe = &uprobe->arch;
@@ -2441,18 +2449,12 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
ri = alloc_return_instance();
if (session)
- ri = push_consumer(ri, push_idx++, uc->id, cookie);
+ ri = push_consumer(ri, uc->id, cookie);
}
current->utask->auprobe = NULL;
- if (!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ri)) {
- /*
- * The push_idx value has the final number of return consumers,
- * and ri->consumers_cnt has number of allocated consumers.
- */
- ri->consumers_cnt = push_idx;
+ if (!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ri))
prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs, ri);
- }
if (remove && has_consumers) {
down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists