[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71d9c99f-aa7d-4697-8561-17b54cfe97c6@icloud.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 19:08:37 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] driver core: Constify API device_find_child()
then adapt for various usages
On 2024/12/6 15:21, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 08:10:13AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Constify the following API:
>> struct device *device_find_child(struct device *dev, void *data,
>> int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data));
>> To :
>> struct device *device_find_child(struct device *dev, const void *data,
>> device_match_t match);
>> typedef int (*device_match_t)(struct device *dev, const void *data);
>> with the following reasons:
>>
>> - Protect caller's match data @*data which is for comparison and lookup
>> and the API does not actually need to modify @*data.
>>
>> - Make the API's parameters (@match)() and @data have the same type as
>> all of other device finding APIs (bus|class|driver)_find_device().
>>
>> - All kinds of existing device match functions can be directly taken
>> as the API's argument, they were exported by driver core.
>>
>> Constify the API and adapt for various existing usages by simply making
>> various match functions take 'const void *' as type of match data @data.
>
> With the discussion that a new name would ease the conversion, maybe
> consider device_find_child_device() to also align the name (somewhat) to
> the above mentioned (bus|class|driver)_find_device()?
> i finally select this squashing method after considerations as shown by
link below:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/3a4de1bb-3eb2-469a-8ff7-ff706804f5bb@icloud.com
device_find_child() is consist with existing device_find_child_by_name()
and device_find_any_child, device's child is also a device, so we may
not need the tail _device().
> Do you have a merge plan already? I guess this patch will go through
> Greg's driver core tree?
>
this patch series is already squashing solution.
yes. hope it move toward mainline by Greg's driver core tree.
(^^)(^^)
> Best regards
> Uwe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists