[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87273a36-07f9-4224-bfff-63e905be9b0a@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:26:35 +0200
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org
Cc: linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quentin.schulz@...rry.de, Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...rry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Don't use dt aliases
to determine phy-id
On 12/6/24 12:34 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...rry.de>
>
> The phy needs to know its identity in the system (phy0 or phy1 on rk3588)
> for some actions and the driver currently contains code abusing of_alias
> for that.
>
> Devicetree aliases are always optional and should not be used for core
> device functionality, so instead keep a list of phys on a soc in the
> of_device_data and find the phy-id by comparing against the mapped
> register-base.
>
> Fixes: c4b09c562086 ("phy: phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Add clock provider support")
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...rry.de>
> ---
> .../phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
> index c5c64c209e96..b137f8c4d157 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
> @@ -385,11 +385,22 @@ enum rk_hdptx_reset {
> RST_MAX
> };
[...]
> +
> + /* find the phy-id from the io address */
> + hdptx->phy_id = -ENODEV;
> + for (id = 0; id < hdptx->cfgs->num_phys; id++) {
> + if (res->start == hdptx->cfgs->phy_ids[id]) {
> + hdptx->phy_id = id;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (hdptx->phy_id < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "no matching device found\n");
Maybe we could simply fallback to assume phy1 doesn't exist in this
case, which avoids the need to provide a match data with a single entry.
Regardless,
Reviewed-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists