[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1LqlaG1IDvuz9Gy@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 12:14:13 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: phy: Move callback comments from
struct to kernel-doc section
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 12:39:52PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Relocate all callback-related comments from the `struct phy_driver`
> definition to a dedicated `kernel-doc` section. This improves code
> readability by decluttering the structure definition and consolidating
> callback documentation in a central place for kernel-doc generation.
>
> No functional changes are introduced by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Thanks for doing this. This will mean that each method will be properly
documented in the generated kernel-doc.
It is a bit obtuse to work around kernel-doc in this way, but worth it
for the sake of the generated documentation containing all the pertinent
details.
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks!
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists