[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024120635-wham-campsite-b62b@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:04:12 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1&6.6 0/3] kbuild: Avoid weak external linkage where
possible
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 04:58:07PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Backport this series to 6.1&6.6 because LoongArch gets build errors with
> latest binutils which has commit 599df6e2db17d1c4 ("ld, LoongArch: print
> error about linking without -fPIC or -fPIE flag in more detail").
>
> CC .vmlinux.export.o
> UPD include/generated/utsversion.h
> CC init/version-timestamp.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1
> loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/kallsyms.o:(.text+0): relocation R_LARCH_PCALA_HI20 against `kallsyms_markers` can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE
> loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/crash_core.o:(.init.text+0x984): relocation R_LARCH_PCALA_HI20 against `kallsyms_names` can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE
> loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/bpf/btf.o:(.text+0xcc7c): relocation R_LARCH_PCALA_HI20 against `__start_BTF` can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE
> loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.43.50.20241126 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c:2673
>
> In theory 5.10&5.15 also need this, but since LoongArch get upstream at
> 5.19, so I just ignore them because there is no error report about other
> archs now.
Odd, why doesn't this affect other arches as well using new binutils? I
hate to have to backport all of this just for one arch, as that feels
odd.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists