lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2011011.1733558696@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 08:04:56 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, zilin@....edu.cn, jianhao.xu@....edu.cn,
    jlayton@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
    mjguzik@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/netfs: Remove redundant use of smp_rmb()

Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> wrote:

> Are you sure removing the smp_rmb() is realy the right thing to do?

The wait_on_bit*() class functions, e.g.:

	wait_on_bit(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
	{
		might_sleep();
		if (!test_bit_acquire(bit, word))
			return 0;
		return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit,
					       bit_wait,
					       mode);
	}

now unconditionally includes an appropriate barrier on the test_bit(), so the
smp_rmb() should be unnecessary, though netfslib should probably be using
clear_and_wake_up_bit().

Probably we need to update the doc to reflect this.

David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ