[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2011011.1733558696@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 08:04:56 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, zilin@....edu.cn, jianhao.xu@....edu.cn,
jlayton@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
mjguzik@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/netfs: Remove redundant use of smp_rmb()
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> wrote:
> Are you sure removing the smp_rmb() is realy the right thing to do?
The wait_on_bit*() class functions, e.g.:
wait_on_bit(unsigned long *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
{
might_sleep();
if (!test_bit_acquire(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit,
bit_wait,
mode);
}
now unconditionally includes an appropriate barrier on the test_bit(), so the
smp_rmb() should be unnecessary, though netfslib should probably be using
clear_and_wake_up_bit().
Probably we need to update the doc to reflect this.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists