[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1QfupFfg07jTMUc@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 10:13:14 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, xfr@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: stmmac: Move extern declarations from
common.h to hwif.h
On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 03:02:48PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> These extern declarations are referenced in hwif.c only.
> Move them to hwif.h just like the other extern declarations.
We normally have declarations in a header file that corresponds to their
definition, rather than where they are used.
> Compile tested only.
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 14 --------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> index 1367fa5c9b8e..fbcf07d201cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> @@ -543,18 +543,8 @@ struct dma_features {
> #define STMMAC_VLAN_INSERT 0x2
> #define STMMAC_VLAN_REPLACE 0x3
>
> -extern const struct stmmac_desc_ops enh_desc_ops;
Defined in enh_desc.c, but no header for it, so either common.h or
hwif.h seems sensible.
> -extern const struct stmmac_desc_ops ndesc_ops;
Defined in norm_desc.c, same situation as previous one.
> -
> struct mac_device_info;
>
> -extern const struct stmmac_hwtimestamp stmmac_ptp;
Defined in stmmac_hwtstamp.c, same as above.
> -extern const struct stmmac_hwtimestamp dwmac1000_ptp;
Ditto.
> -extern const struct stmmac_mode_ops dwmac4_ring_mode_ops;
Defined in dwmac4_descs.c, maybe dwmac4_descs.h or dwmac4.h would make
more sense than hwif.c ?
> -
> -extern const struct ptp_clock_info stmmac_ptp_clock_ops;
Defined in stmmac_ptp.c, and there is stmmac_ptp.h which contains a
number of function declarations, so maybe moving that there would
make more sense?
> -extern const struct ptp_clock_info dwmac1000_ptp_clock_ops;
Same as stmmac_ptp_clock_ops.
> -
> struct mac_link {
> u32 caps;
> u32 speed_mask;
> @@ -641,8 +631,4 @@ void stmmac_dwmac4_set_mac(void __iomem *ioaddr, bool enable);
>
> void dwmac_dma_flush_tx_fifo(void __iomem *ioaddr);
>
> -extern const struct stmmac_mode_ops ring_mode_ops;
Defined in ring_mode.c, same as enh_desc_ops.
> -extern const struct stmmac_mode_ops chain_mode_ops;
Defined in chain_mode.c, same as enh_desc_ops.
> -extern const struct stmmac_desc_ops dwmac4_desc_ops;
Defined in dwmac4_descs.c, similar situation to dwmac4_ring_mode_ops
above.
So I think rather than bulk moving these to hwif.h, where some of them
remain out of place, maybe placing some in a more appropriate header
would be better.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists