[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9830993d-943b-4079-b31d-7c77ee83d306@denx.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 12:42:44 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Mingwei Zheng <zmw12306@...il.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, make24@...as.ac.cn, peng.fan@....com,
fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: stm32: Add check for clk_enable()
On 12/6/24 10:43 PM, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1646,8 +1645,8 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret) {
> fwnode_handle_put(child);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < pctl->nbanks; i++)
> - clk_disable_unprepare(pctl->banks[i].clk);
> + clk_bulk_disable(pctl->nbanks, pctl->clks);
> + clk_bulk_unprepare(pctl->nbanks, pctl->clks);
Use clk_bulk_disable_unprepare()
include/linux/clk.h:static inline void clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(int
num_clks,
It looks pretty good otherwise, thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists