[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d205aae9-68d5-41f1-8739-779b2d9a6664@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 16:26:46 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno," <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v10 8/9] net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 5-Port
Gigabit DSA Switch driver
Le 08/12/2024 à 01:20, Christian Marangi a écrit :
> Add Airoha AN8855 5-Port Gigabit DSA switch. Switch can support
> 10M, 100M, 1Gb, 2.5G and 5G Ethernet Speed but 5G is currently error out
> as it's not currently supported as requires additional configuration for
> the PCS.
>
> The switch is also a nvmem-provider as it does have EFUSE to calibrate
> the internal PHYs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@...lic.gmane.org>
> ---
...
> +static int an8855_read_switch_id(struct an8855_priv *priv)
> +{
> + u32 id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, AN8855_CREV, &id);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (id != AN8855_ID) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "Switch id detected %x but expected %x",
missing \n
> + id, AN8855_ID);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
...
> +static void an8855_switch_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct an8855_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!priv)
> + return;
I don't think this can happen. So it could be removed?
> +
> + dsa_unregister_switch(priv->ds);
> +}
...
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists