[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62f0402c-89a4-4ca8-b443-fbc9cc3b2055@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 10:35:16 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Hanabishi <i.r.e.c.c.a.k.u.n+kernel.org@...il.com>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>, gautham.shenoy@....com,
perry.yuan@....com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Set initial min_freq to
lowest_nonlinear_freq
On 12/8/2024 01:54, Hanabishi wrote:
> Hello. Maybe I'm too late on this, but I have some concerns.
>
> On 10/17/24 05:39, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> In other systems, power consumption has increased but so has the
>> throughput/watt.
>
> I just want to bring up the fact that this change affects all governors.
> It sounds good for the performance governor, but not so much for the
> powersave governor.
>
> So the question is: don't we want the lowest power consumption possible
> in the powersave mode? Even if it means decreased efficiency. Powersave
> by definition supposed to make battery last as long as possible no
> matter what, isn't it?
>
No, the powersave governor isn't a one stop shop to bring everything to
longest battery.
By your argument we should set the EPP to "power" by default and "boost"
to off by default when the powersave governor is enacted?
All of those are far too aggressive for a default behavior. Setting the
lowest nonlinear frequency as the default lowest scaling frequency is
about having a good default that balances responsiveness, battery life
and performance.
Like all knobs anyone that doesn't agree with it can of course modify it
from sysfs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists