[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1byK9X59RHFJMHZ@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:35:39 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
lokeshgidra@...gle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, Jason@...c4.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, rmap: handle anon_vma_fork() NULL check inline
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:25:49PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Check the anon_vma of pvma inline so we can avoid the function call
> overhead if the anon_vma is NULL.
This really gets you 1% perf improvement? On what hardware?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists