linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] arm64: qcom: Add support for QCS9075 boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z1c4sIX0QNufi6xe@hu-wasimn-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:07:10 +0530
From: Wasim Nazir <quic_wasimn@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] arm64: qcom: Add support for QCS9075 boards

On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 07:46:55PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 04:13:45PM +0530, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:41:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 19/11/2024 18:49, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> > > > This series:
> > > > 
> > > > Add support for Qualcomm's rb8, ride/ride-r3 boards using QCS9075 SoC.
> > > > 
> > > > QCS9075 is compatible IoT-industrial grade variant of SA8775p SoC
> > > How does it relate to qcs9100? Why this is not compatible with the
> > > other? It looks like you duplicate here a lot without trying to make
> > > these built on top of each other.
> > > 
> > 
> > QCS9075 is non-safe while QCS9100 is safe.
> > Reference: https://docs.qualcomm.com/bundle/publicresource/87-83840-1_REV_A_Qualcomm_IQ9_Series_Product_Brief.pdf
> > 
> > Separate board files are needed as thermal mitigation changes are
> > required for non-safe variant only.
> 
> To reduce possible questions, please include those in the initial
> submission.
> 

Sure, will add the differences in next patch version.

> -- 
> With best wishes
> Dmitry

Thanks & Regards,
Wasim