[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241209193102.GD2368570@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:31:02 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Daisuke Matsuda <matsuda-daisuke@...itsu.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, leon@...nel.org, zyjzyj2000@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rpearsonhpe@...il.com,
lizhijian@...itsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v8 3/6] RDMA/rxe: Add page invalidation support
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 10:59:00AM +0900, Daisuke Matsuda wrote:
> +static bool rxe_ib_invalidate_range(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
> + const struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
> + unsigned long cur_seq)
> +{
> + struct ib_umem_odp *umem_odp =
> + container_of(mni, struct ib_umem_odp, notifier);
> + struct rxe_mr *mr = umem_odp->private;
> + unsigned long start, end;
> +
> + if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
> + return false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&umem_odp->umem_mutex);
> + mmu_interval_set_seq(mni, cur_seq);
> +
> + start = max_t(u64, ib_umem_start(umem_odp), range->start);
> + end = min_t(u64, ib_umem_end(umem_odp), range->end);
> +
> + rxe_mr_unset_xarray(mr, start, end);
> +
> + /* update umem_odp->dma_list */
> + ib_umem_odp_unmap_dma_pages(umem_odp, start, end);
This seems like a strange thing to do, rxe has the xarray so why does
it use the odp->dma_list?
I think what you want is to have rxe disable the odp->dma_list and use
its xarray instead
Or use the odp lists as-is and don't include the xarray?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists