[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5yfas7yzilvjryrtdi2miaw5khnycm7egn4dd5ff3vu7z4op5@oit2xvsyx5l5>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 23:04:11 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: check dpu_plane_atomic_print_state() for
valid sspp
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 12:37:51PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> Similar to the r_pipe sspp protect, add a check to protect
> the pipe state prints to avoid NULL ptr dereference for cases when
> the state is dumped without a corresponding atomic_check() where the
> pipe->sspp is assigned.
>
> Fixes: 31f7148fd370 ("drm/msm/dpu: move pstate->pipe initialization to dpu_plane_atomic_check")
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/issues/67
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> ---
> To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> To: Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
> To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> To: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
> To: Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 3ffac24333a2a5b01135d4ece418432d4a74dc04..fe3fd9587ec61f241ccb8c28925c7902b92bcdcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -1333,14 +1333,17 @@ static void dpu_plane_atomic_print_state(struct drm_printer *p,
> const struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> const struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
>
> - drm_printf(p, "\tstage=%d\n", pstate->stage);
> -
> - drm_printf(p, "\tsspp[0]=%s\n", pipe->sspp->cap->name);
> - drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_mode[0]=%s\n", dpu_get_multirect_mode(pipe->multirect_mode));
> - drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_index[0]=%s\n",
> - dpu_get_multirect_index(pipe->multirect_index));
> - drm_printf(p, "\tsrc[0]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect));
> - drm_printf(p, "\tdst[0]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect));
> + if (pipe->sspp) {
> + drm_printf(p, "\tstage=%d\n", pstate->stage);
Please keep pstate->stage out of the if() statement. LGTM otherwise.
> +
> + drm_printf(p, "\tsspp[0]=%s\n", pipe->sspp->cap->name);
> + drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_mode[0]=%s\n",
> + dpu_get_multirect_mode(pipe->multirect_mode));
> + drm_printf(p, "\tmultirect_index[0]=%s\n",
> + dpu_get_multirect_index(pipe->multirect_index));
> + drm_printf(p, "\tsrc[0]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect));
> + drm_printf(p, "\tdst[0]=" DRM_RECT_FMT "\n", DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect));
> + }
>
> if (r_pipe->sspp) {
> drm_printf(p, "\tsspp[1]=%s\n", r_pipe->sspp->cap->name);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 9d6a414ad31e8eb296cd6f2c1834b2c6994960a0
> change-id: 20241209-check-state-before-dump-2a015ace5f49
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists