[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2693069-2f8f-458b-98c2-f9d43514061b@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:54:04 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: liuderong@...o.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
peter.wang@...iatek.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
ahalaney@...hat.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi:ufs:core: update compl_time_stamp_local_clock
after complete a cqe
On 12/5/24 11:29 PM, liuderong@...o.com wrote:
> From: liuderong <liuderong@...o.com>
>
> For now, lrbp->compl_time_stamp_local_clock is set to zero
> after send a sqe, but it is not updated after complete a cqe,
> the printed information in ufshcd_print_tr will always be zero.
> So update lrbp->cmpl_time_stamp_local_clock after complete a cqe.
>
> Log sample:
> ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: UPIU[8] - issue time 8750227249 us
> ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: UPIU[8] - complete time 0 us
>
> Fixes: c30d8d010b5e ("scsi: ufs: core: Prepare for completion in MCQ")
> Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: liuderong <liuderong@...o.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: add fixes tag
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 6a26853..bd70fe1 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -5519,6 +5519,7 @@ void ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(struct ufs_hba *hba, int task_tag,
>
> lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
> lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
> + lrbp->compl_time_stamp_local_clock = local_clock();
> cmd = lrbp->cmd;
> if (cmd) {
> if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
Although this patch looks good to me: an infrastructure for gathering
I/O statistics should not occur in the UFS driver. This functionality
should be moved into the block layer core.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists