[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB60830B8ED36CCA7E304D9E97FC3C2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 22:35:01 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "Chatre, Reinette"
<reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>, "Jonathan
Corbet" <corbet@....net>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, James Morse
<james.morse@....com>, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, "Shaopeng Tan
(Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/8] x86/resctrl: Prepare for per-CTRL_MON group
mba_MBps control
> > mba_mbps_default_event isn't architecture specific. The mba_MBps
> > feedback code could be implemented on any architecture that supports
> > both measurement and control of memory bandwidth.
>
> Yes, and it should be moved to that header then, right?
>
> But not earlier.
If you feel strongly about it then go ahead and cut the line from <linux/rectrl.h>
and paste it into <asm/resctrl.h>
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists