[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e9be877-0cbd-4794-9601-39721ca9b698@prolan.hu>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:09:57 +0100
From: Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
To: Karol Przybylski <karprzy7@...il.com>, <samuel@...lland.org>,
<sre@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: Fix uninitialized variable in
ip5xxx_battery_set_property
Hi,
On 2024. 12. 09. 22:23, Karol Przybylski wrote:
> The variable vmax in the ip5xxx_battery_set_property function is used uninitialized when passed to switch/case statements.
>
> This patch initializes vmax to 0 at declaration.
>
> Issue discovered in coverity, CID 1602239
>
> Signed-off-by: Karol Przybylski <karprzy7@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c b/drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c
> index 4bcf0ea0e..65d3266c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int ip5xxx_battery_set_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> {
> struct ip5xxx *ip5xxx = power_supply_get_drvdata(psy);
> unsigned int rval;
> - int ret, vmax;
> + int ret, vmax = 0;
>
> ret = ip5xxx_initialize(psy);
> if (ret)
This is not the proper way to fix this. See my patch below.
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20241208131532.1028581-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu/
Bence
Powered by blists - more mailing lists