linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v20 00/19] tracing: fprobe: function_graph: Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241209153618.87e9a6084898575ac06d81c0@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:36:18 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)"
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
 Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alan Maguire
 <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/19] tracing: fprobe: function_graph:
 Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph

On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:52:47 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:35:56 +0100
> Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:08:56AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Here is the 20th version of the series to re-implement the fprobe on
> > > function-graph tracer. The previous version is;
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/173125372214.172790.6929368952404083802.stgit@devnote2/
> > > 
> > > This version is rebased on v6.13-rc1 and fixes to make CONFIG_FPROBE
> > > "n" by default, so that it does not enable function graph tracer by
> > > default.  
> > 
> > Is there a reason why you didn't add the ACKs I provided for s390
> > related patches for v19 of this series?
> 
> Probably just missed it.
> 
> Masami,
> 
> One thing I usually do when I rebase to a new series is to take my older
> patch series from Patchwork and reapply them. Because patchwork will pick
> up any acks, reviewed-bys or tested-bys. I then only drop the tags if the
> patch needs significant changes.

Oops, sorry, I missed those tags on v19. Let me fix that.

Thanks.

> 
> You can also use b4 to do the same.
> 
> -- Steve


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>