lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <k2pnpu3ef2rgy6wre2qrearwmetzb4v4meiyqpy7oyg45hohlp@kmnzulhbmdk6>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:03:45 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org, 
	kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com, peter.griffin@...aro.org, 
	javierm@...hat.com, tzimmermann@...e.de, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, 
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: firmware: add
 samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc bindings

On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 05:53:43PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> Add bindings for the samsung exynos ACPM mailbox protocol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../firmware/samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc.yaml     | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bfc9b4af9ea1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc.yaml


Filename based on comaptible, so google,gs101-acpm-ipc.yaml

> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright 2024 Linaro Ltd.
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/firmware/samsung,exynos-acpm-ipc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Samsung exynos ACPM mailbox protocol

s/exynos/Exynos/

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
> +
> +description: |
> +  ACPM (Alive Clock and Power Manager) is a firmware that operates on the
> +  APM (Active Power Management) module that handles overall power management
> +  activities. ACPM and masters regard each other as independent hardware
> +  component and communicate with each other using mailbox messages and
> +  shared memory.
> +
> +  This binding is intended to define the interface the firmware implementing
> +  ACPM provides for OSPM in the device tree.
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    const: acpm_ipc

Drop, no schemas have anything like this.

> +
> +  compatible:
> +    const: google,gs101-acpm-ipc
> +
> +  mboxes:
> +    description:
> +      List of phandle and mailbox channel specifiers.

Drop description.

> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  shmem:
> +    description:
> +      List of phandle pointing to the shared memory (SHM) area. The memory
> +      contains channels configuration data and the TX/RX ring buffers that
> +      are used for passing messages to/from the ACPM firmware.
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  initdata-base:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    description:
> +      Base address of the configuration data in the shared memory.

If you really need this, then it should be rather encoded as part of
shemm phandle (phandle-array with describing items, just like syscon
phandles are done).

But OTOH, I don't see why this is needed at all so far - compatible
defines it.

> +
> +additionalProperties: false

This should be placed after required block.

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - mboxes
> +  - shmem
> +  - initdata-base
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    firmware {

Drop

> +        acpm_ipc: acpm_ipc {

Drop unused label.

Node name: power-management (based on your binding description)
Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation

> +            compatible = "google,gs101-acpm-ipc";

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ