[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1a7EfETQi3FSLJG@gpd3>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 10:40:33 +0100
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
To: Changwoo Min <multics69@...il.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, void@...ifault.com, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, changwoo@...lia.com, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock_update/stale()
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:15:27PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> scx_rq_clock_update() and scx_rq_clock_stale() manage the status of an
> rq clock when sched_ext is enabled. scx_rq_clock_update() keeps the rq
> clock in memory and its status valid. scx_rq_clock_stale() invalidates
> the current rq clock not to use the cached rq clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 440ecedf871b..7e71d8685fcc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ enum scx_rq_flags {
> SCX_RQ_BAL_PENDING = 1 << 2, /* balance hasn't run yet */
> SCX_RQ_BAL_KEEP = 1 << 3, /* balance decided to keep current */
> SCX_RQ_BYPASSING = 1 << 4,
> + SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID = 1 << 5, /* RQ clock is fresh and valid */
>
> SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP = 1 << 16,
> SCX_RQ_IN_BALANCE = 1 << 17,
> @@ -766,9 +767,11 @@ struct scx_rq {
> unsigned long ops_qseq;
> u64 extra_enq_flags; /* see move_task_to_local_dsq() */
> u32 nr_running;
> - u32 flags;
> u32 cpuperf_target; /* [0, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE] */
> bool cpu_released;
> + u32 flags;
> + u64 clock; /* current per-rq clock -- see scx_bpf_now_ns() */
> + u64 prev_clock; /* previous per-rq clock -- see scx_bpf_now_ns() */
Since we're reordering this struct, we may want to move cpu_released all
the way to the bottom to get rid of the 3-bytes hole (and still have
flags, clock and prev_clock in the same cacheline).
> cpumask_var_t cpus_to_kick;
> cpumask_var_t cpus_to_kick_if_idle;
> cpumask_var_t cpus_to_preempt;
> @@ -1725,9 +1728,28 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__scx_switched_all); /* all fair class tasks on SCX */
>
> #define scx_enabled() static_branch_unlikely(&__scx_ops_enabled)
> #define scx_switched_all() static_branch_unlikely(&__scx_switched_all)
> +
> +static inline void scx_rq_clock_update(struct rq *rq, u64 clock)
> +{
> + if (scx_enabled()) {
> + rq->scx.prev_clock = rq->scx.clock;
> + rq->scx.clock = clock;
> + rq->scx.flags |= SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID;
> + }
> +}
Nit, this is just personal preference (feel free to ignore it):
if (!scx_enabled())
return;
rq->scx.prev_clock = rq->scx.clock;
rq->scx.clock = clock;
rq->scx.flags |= SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID;
> +
> +static inline void scx_rq_clock_stale(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + if (scx_enabled())
> + rq->scx.flags &= ~SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID;
> +}
I'm wondering if we need to invalidate the clock on all rqs when we call
scx_ops_enable() to prevent getting stale information from a previous
scx scheduler.
Probably it's not an issue, since scx_ops_disable_workfn() should make
sure that all tasks are going through rq_unpin_lock() before unloading
the current scheduler, maybe it could be helpful to add comment about
this scenario in scx_bpf_now_ns() (PATCH 4/6)?
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT */
> #define scx_enabled() false
> #define scx_switched_all() false
> +
> +static inline void scx_rq_clock_update(struct rq *rq, u64 clock) {}
> +static inline void scx_rq_clock_stale(struct rq *rq) {}
> #endif /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT */
>
> /*
> --
> 2.47.1
>
Thanks,
-Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists