[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5f7f562-c8b0-422b-bb51-744ecba7ecee@flourine.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 10:42:17 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com, storagedev@...rochip.com,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] blk: refactor queue affinity helpers
Hi Jens,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 03:00:08PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> I've rebased and retested the series on top of for-6.14/block and updated
> the docummentation as requested by John.
>
> Original cover letter:
>
> These patches were part of 'honor isolcpus configuration' [1] series. To
> simplify the review process I decided to send this as separate series
> because I think it's a nice cleanup independent of the isolcpus feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
I've based this work on top of your tree as I think it should go your
tree. If this should go via different tree, let me know which one.
And in case the series didn't hit your inbox, I really don't know what I
am doing wrong. I've switched over to use b4 and korg for sending the
patches and on my side all looks good and the mails also appear on lore
completely normal.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists