[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aibjwqdjq7h5in7otsbtrnj67yrv3m4aegvkuk6ljwxpx57ayy@f7fowpequede>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 10:43:18 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: codecs: wcd9335: Add define for number of DAIs
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 11:42:24PM +0300, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> чт, 5 дек. 2024 г. в 16:31, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 04:29:45PM +0300, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> >
> > > This is the 1st patch in series, and NUM_CODEC_DAIS redefine from bindings
> > > is deleted in the 2nd one.
> >
> > I know, that still means this change is broken.
>
> How to avoid broken change, when moving constant from dt-binding to*.c
> file, given we have constraint of separate patch for bindings?
There is no problem here, I just screwed, because 6+1 != 7.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists