[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d8f9fd9-5735-4285-b7db-9d8c1bf58c95@lucifer.local>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:02:51 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: correctly reference merged VMA
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 05:40:39PM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> * Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> [241206 16:52]:
> > On second merge attempt on mmap() we incorrectly discard the possibly
> > merged VMA, resulting in a possible use-after-free (and most certainly a
> > reference to the wrong VMA) in this instance in the subsequent
> > __mmap_complete() invocation.
> >
> > Correct this mistake by reassigning vma correctly if a merge succeeds in
> > this case.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+91cf8da9401355f946c3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67536a25.050a0220.a30f1.0149.GAE@google.com/
> > Fixes: 5ac87a885aec ("mm: defer second attempt at merge on mmap()")
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
>
> My cries to delete this optimisation continue.
I'd love to too, but it does seem that has an important use in that you get a
file system/driver that sets certain VMA flags.
So you have:
[ VMA B ] <- map
[ VMA A ] < space > [ VMA C ]
Merge attempt #1 - missing VM_xxx that is set by f_op->mmap() hook
Merge attempt #2 - succeed because VM_xxx is set.
This, I think, speaks to the need to provide a means by which
filesystems/drivers can manipulate VMA flags _up front_. At which point we can
eliminate this.
I mean as you say this is an -optimisation- and having split VMAs will work fine
(modulo mremap weirdness), but because of the above it becomes possible for
there to be a major proliferation of unneeded VMAs, so it's not quite as much of
a fringe thing as it might appear to be.
I mean we can also talk about the fact that there's logic in __mmap_complete()
that clears VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT under certain circumstances which is just
not considered for merging at all but... yeah. That is, at least, much less
likely.
>
> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
Thanks :)
>
> > ---
> > mm/vma.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c
> > index 8a454a7bbc80..1ec349141f5e 100644
> > --- a/mm/vma.c
> > +++ b/mm/vma.c
> > @@ -2460,10 +2460,13 @@ unsigned long __mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> >
> > /* If flags changed, we might be able to merge, so try again. */
> > if (map.retry_merge) {
> > + struct vm_area_struct *merged;
> > VMG_MMAP_STATE(vmg, &map, vma);
> >
> > vma_iter_config(map.vmi, map.addr, map.end);
> > - vma_merge_existing_range(&vmg);
> > + merged = vma_merge_existing_range(&vmg);
> > + if (merged)
> > + vma = merged;
> > }
> >
> > __mmap_complete(&map, vma);
> > --
> > 2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists