lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241209110842.GM21636@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:08:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	surenb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the tip tree

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 01:29:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the mm tree as different commits
> (but the same patches):
> 
>   96450ead1652 ("seqlock: add raw_seqcount_try_begin")
>   eb449bd96954 ("mm: convert mm_lock_seq to a proper seqcount")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   46dbe8ab1205 ("seqlock: add raw_seqcount_try_begin")
>   5f0d64389e1f ("mm: convert mm_lock_seq to a proper seqcount")
> 
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree.  The latter ones are already
> causing conflicts.

Why is this in -mm ? I agreed with Suren I'd take them through
tip/perf/core to go along with Andrii's uprobe patch that relies on
them.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ