[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241209110842.GM21636@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:08:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
surenb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the tip tree
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 01:29:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in the mm tree as different commits
> (but the same patches):
>
> 96450ead1652 ("seqlock: add raw_seqcount_try_begin")
> eb449bd96954 ("mm: convert mm_lock_seq to a proper seqcount")
>
> These are commits
>
> 46dbe8ab1205 ("seqlock: add raw_seqcount_try_begin")
> 5f0d64389e1f ("mm: convert mm_lock_seq to a proper seqcount")
>
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree. The latter ones are already
> causing conflicts.
Why is this in -mm ? I agreed with Suren I'd take them through
tip/perf/core to go along with Andrii's uprobe patch that relies on
them.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists