[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241209201326.31f5e339f70302f80c641c88@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 20:13:26 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, liaochang1@...wei.com, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core] uprobes: guard against kmemdup() failing in
dup_return_instance()
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:34:36 -0800
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org> wrote:
> If kmemdup() failed to alloc memory, don't proceed with extra_consumers
> copy.
>
> Fixes: e62f2d492728 ("uprobes: Simplify session consumer tracking")
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thanks!
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 1af950208c2b..1f75a2f91206 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -2048,6 +2048,8 @@ static struct return_instance *dup_return_instance(struct return_instance *old)
> struct return_instance *ri;
>
> ri = kmemdup(old, sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ri)
> + return NULL;
>
> if (unlikely(old->cons_cnt > 1)) {
> ri->extra_consumers = kmemdup(old->extra_consumers,
> --
> 2.43.5
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists