linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] acpi/ghes: don't check if physical

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241209135644.19869834@foz.lan>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:56:44 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Shiju Jose
 <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, Ani Sinha <anisinha@...hat.com>, Dongjiu Geng
 <gengdongjiu1@...il.com>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <qemu-arm@...gnu.org>,
 <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] acpi/ghes: don't check if physical_address is
 not zero

Em Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:36:40 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> escreveu:

> On Sat,  7 Dec 2024 09:54:14 +0100
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > The 'physical_address' value is a faulty page. As such, 0 is
> > as valid as any other value.  
> Still not sure on what faulty pages are :)
> 
> Given I tagged previous (after you'd sent this)
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

It seems I forgot adding this tag, from Igor's review, as per:
	https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20241204141246.37a7cb9d@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com/
This patch was reviwed by Igor already, so:

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>

> 
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  hw/acpi/ghes.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes.c b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > index edc74c38bf8a..a3dffd78b012 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > @@ -400,10 +400,6 @@ int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> >  
> >      start_addr = le64_to_cpu(ags->ghes_addr_le);
> >  
> > -    if (!physical_address) {
> > -        return -1;
> > -    }
> > -
> >      start_addr += source_id * sizeof(uint64_t);
> >  
> >      cpu_physical_memory_read(start_addr, &error_block_addr,  
> 



Thanks,
Mauro