[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1hLEQwYE3ymbrIr@x1>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:07:13 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, thomas.falcon@...el.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libperf: evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid
platform
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:56:21PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> On 10/12/2024 1:51 pm, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > James, the second patch isn't applying to perf-tools/perf-tools.
> The second one applies on
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20241113011956.402096-1-irogers@google.com/T/#m2a3587fb83e6ab2d970bae25982ae9d6c8d9e5cd
> because that also does an evlist__remove() which gets fixed up.
Right, I have to test that series on the ARM machines I have access to,
but there is a question from a tester that is waiting for a reply, I'll
see if I can reproduce that problem as well.
> But the first one is ok to go in on its own.
Agreed.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists