linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] ARM: drop CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241210160556.2341497-4-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:05:55 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: drop CONFIG_HIGHPTE support

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

CONFIG_HIGHPTE was added in linux-2.6.32, a few years before 64-bit
support. At the time it made sense, as the CONFIG_ARM_LPAE option allowed
systems with 16GB of memory that made lowmem a particularly scarce
resource, and the HIGHPTE implementation gave feature parity with 32-bit
x86 and frv machines.

Since Arm is the last architecture remaining that uses this, and almost
no 32-bit machines support more than 4GB of RAM, the cost of continuing
to maintain HIGHPTE seems unjustified, so remove it here to allow
simplifying the generic page table handling.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241204103042.1904639-8-arnd@kernel.org/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
I sent a patch to drop HIGHPTE support on x86 today, see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241210144945.2325330-9-arnd@kernel.org/T/#u

If that one gets merged, we can merge this one instead of the one
that makes HIGHPTE depend on !PREEMPT_RT, but if we decide against
the x86 change, then we probably don't want this one either.
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig               | 11 -----------
 arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h |  8 +-------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 4de4e5697bdf..e132effafd8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1229,17 +1229,6 @@ config HIGHMEM
 
 	  If unsure, say n.
 
-config HIGHPTE
-	bool "Allocate 2nd-level pagetables from highmem" if EXPERT
-	depends on HIGHMEM && !PREEMPT_RT
-	default y
-	help
-	  The VM uses one page of physical memory for each page table.
-	  For systems with a lot of processes, this can use a lot of
-	  precious low memory, eventually leading to low memory being
-	  consumed by page tables.  Setting this option will allow
-	  user-space 2nd level page tables to reside in high memory.
-
 config ARM_PAN
 	bool "Enable privileged no-access"
 	depends on MMU
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index a17f01235c29..ef6cb3e6d179 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -85,18 +85,12 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return pte;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
-#define PGTABLE_HIGHMEM __GFP_HIGHMEM
-#else
-#define PGTABLE_HIGHMEM 0
-#endif
-
 static inline pgtable_t
 pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	struct page *pte;
 
-	pte = __pte_alloc_one(mm, GFP_PGTABLE_USER | PGTABLE_HIGHMEM);
+	pte = __pte_alloc_one(mm, GFP_PGTABLE_USER);
 	if (!pte)
 		return NULL;
 	if (!PageHighMem(pte))
-- 
2.39.5