[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1hte2LnnPdC6DMm@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:34:03 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Cc: donald.hunter@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, stfomichev@...il.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] tools: ynl: add main install target
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 02:56:05PM +0100, Jan Stancek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 10:30 PM Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > > This will install C library, specs, rsts and pyynl. The initial
> > > structure is:
> > >
> > > $ mkdir /tmp/myroot
> > > $ make DESTDIR=/tmp/myroot install
> > >
> > > /usr
> > > /usr/lib64
> > > /usr/lib64/libynl.a
> >
> > This is super useful thanks for doing this work. I could be missing
> > something, but it looks like the install target does not install the
> > generated C headers that user code can include at build time.
> >
> > Am I reading that right? Is that intentional? I was thinking that it
> > would be really useful to have the headers installed, too.
>
> It's not intentional, just noone asked for it yet. We can add those.
> Would /usr/include/ynl/ work? Or do you/others have a different suggestion?
/usr/include/ynl sounds good to me, but happy to see if other folks
have suggestions.
Thanks for being open to adding this; it'll make developing user
apps with libynl much easier.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists