linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] iio: accel: adxl345: rename variable data to st

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFXKEHZu7SFx9DS3-cy-=JXSRL6CD0L-WG_BACNa=0w9f_yOEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:57 +0100
From: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eraretuya@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] iio: accel: adxl345: rename variable data to st

Hi,

On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu,  5 Dec 2024 17:13:35 +0000
> Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Rename the locally used variable data to st. The st refers to "state",
> > representing the internal state of the driver object. Further it
> > prepares the usage of an internal data pointer needed for the
> > implementation of the sensor features.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git. Initially pushed out as testing
> to let the bots take a look.

Should I actually drop the "applied" patches in a v6? Or, may I keep them?

I see that Dan Carpenters smatch now comes up with some issues. So, do
the fixes go into v6 here, or better separate?

Best,
L