lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i9SresLT14aWuyodKyi2y3yyC8wLMYzrSD4ec=9WVSvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:31:30 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ACPI: bus: implement acpi_get_physical_device_location
 when !ACPI

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:48 AM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Provide an implementation of acpi_get_physical_device_location that can
> be used when CONFIG_ACPI is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index eaafca41cf02..4888231422ea 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ acpi_status
>  acpi_evaluate_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, u32 status_code,
>                   struct acpi_buffer *status_buf);
>
> -acpi_status
> -acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
> -
>  bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
>  acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
>                                        u64 arg);
> @@ -60,6 +57,9 @@ bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 funcs);
>  union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid,
>                         u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +acpi_status
> +acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
> +
>  static inline union acpi_object *
>  acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev,
>                         u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4,
> @@ -1003,6 +1003,8 @@ static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
>
>  static inline int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void) { return 0; }
>
> +#define acpi_get_physical_device_location(handle, pld) (AE_ERROR)

This is a function, so static inline please.

Analogously in patches [4,6/7].

And you can merge patches [2-6/7] together into one patch, as far as
I'm concerned.

> +
>  #define for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, uid, hrv)                   \
>         for (adev = NULL; false && (hid) && (uid) && (hrv);)
>
>
> --

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ