[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXN-KaVnyciw-YBauS=QSWfi36Aan9eGu1xFV57MDcnNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:24:28 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>, Benjamin Gray <bgray@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf jevents: Fix build issue in '*/' in event descriptions
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:17 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:15:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 01:29:15PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 12:28 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:35:34AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 8:56 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For big string offsets we output comments for what string the offset
> > > > > > is for. If the string contains a '*/' as seen in Intel Arrowlake event
> > > > > > descriptions, then this causes C parsing issues for the generated
> > > > > > pmu-events.c. Catch such '*/' values and escape to avoid this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Ping.
> > > >
> > > > A fixes: is missing, probably this should go via perf-tools, i.e. for
> > > > this merge window?
> > >
> > > We don't yet have arrowlake events/metrics, should there be a fixes?
> >
> > Ok, thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > > I'm just preparing the patches for the latest vendor json from Intel,
> > > but they will depend on this. I suspect given the size of the vendor
> > > json it will miss the current merge window.
> >
> > Probably best to have big patches via perf-tools-next at this point in
> > time.
>
> I'm seeing this after applying:
>
> /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py:434: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\*'
> return s.replace('*/', '\*\/')
It likely needs to be:
```
return s.replace('*/', r'\*\/')
```
note the r. Could you test for me?
Thanks,
Ian
>
>
> ⬢ [acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ head /etc/os-release
> NAME="Fedora Linux"
> VERSION="40 (Toolbx Container Image)"
> ID=fedora
> VERSION_ID=40
> VERSION_CODENAME=""
> PLATFORM_ID="platform:f40"
> PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux 40 (Toolbx Container Image)"
> ANSI_COLOR="0;38;2;60;110;180"
> LOGO=fedora-logo-icon
> CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:40"
> ⬢ [acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$ python --version
> Python 3.12.7
> ⬢ [acme@...lbox perf-tools-next]$
Powered by blists - more mailing lists