[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1isHpuHqHSX-jHd@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:01:18 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] ACPI: bus: implement acpi_device_hid when !ACPI
Hi Ricardo,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 07:56:03PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Provide an implementation of acpi_device_hid that can be used when
> CONFIG_ACPI is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> ---
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 4f1b3a6f107b..c25914a152ee 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -1003,6 +1003,11 @@ static inline int unregister_acpi_bus_type(void *bus) { return 0; }
>
> static inline int acpi_wait_for_acpi_ipmi(void) { return 0; }
>
> +static inline const char *acpi_device_hid(struct acpi_device *device)
> +{
> + return "";
> +}
I wonder if any caller might expect something of a string if provided?
Valid _HIDs are either 7 or 8 characters whereas the proper version of the
function returns "device" when one cannot be found (dummy_hid in
drivers/acpi/scan.c). Unlikely to be a problem perhaps.
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> +
> static inline acpi_status
> acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld)
> {
>
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists