[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173386568446.497546.553726469163110460.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:00 -0600
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for Priva E-Measuringbox board
On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 11:34:30 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This patch series introduces support for the Priva E-Measuringbox board
> based on the ST STM32MP133 SoC. The set includes all the necessary
> changes for device tree bindings, vendor prefixes, thermal support, and
> board-specific devicetree to pass devicetree validation and checkpatch
> tests.
>
> changes v2:
> - drop: dt-bindings: net: Add TI DP83TD510 10BaseT1L PHY
>
> Oleksij Rempel (2):
> dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add prefix for Priva
> dt-bindings: arm: stm32: Add Priva E-Measuringbox board
>
> Roan van Dijk (2):
> arm: dts: stm32: Add thermal support for STM32MP131
> arm: dts: stm32: Add Priva E-Measuringbox devicetree
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/stm32.yaml | 6 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp131.dtsi | 35 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp133c-prihmb.dts | 496 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 540 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp133c-prihmb.dts
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
>
My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.
Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.
If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y st/stm32mp133c-prihmb.dtb' for 20241209103434.359522-1-o.rempel@...gutronix.de:
arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp133c-prihmb.dtb: adc@...04000: adc@0:interrupts: 0 was expected
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp133c-prihmb.dtb: adc@...03000: adc@0:interrupts: 0 was expected
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.yaml#
Powered by blists - more mailing lists