[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241210220517.3744-4-gourry@gourry.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:05:17 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com,
gourry@...rry.net,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
david@...hat.com,
rppt@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de,
hpa@...or.com,
rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org,
osalvador@...e.de,
Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/3] acpi,srat: give memory block size advice based on CFMWS alignment
Capacity is stranded when CFMWS regions are not aligned to block size.
On x86, block size increases with capacity (2G blocks @ 64G capacity).
Use CFMWS base/size to report memory block size alignment advice.
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Tested-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index bec0dcd1f9c3..af7d51222933 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
+#include <linux/memory.h>
#include <linux/numa.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/topology.h>
@@ -339,13 +340,22 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
{
struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *cfmws;
int *fake_pxm = arg;
- u64 start, end;
+ u64 start, end, align;
int node;
cfmws = (struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *)header;
start = cfmws->base_hpa;
end = cfmws->base_hpa + cfmws->window_size;
+ /* Align memblock size to CFMW regions if possible */
+ align = 1UL << __ffs(start | end);
+ if (align >= SZ_256M) {
+ if (memory_block_advise_max_size(align) < 0)
+ pr_warn("CFMWS: memblock size advise failed\n");
+ } else {
+ pr_err("CFMWS: [BIOS BUG] base/size alignment violates spec\n");
+ }
+
/*
* The SRAT may have already described NUMA details for all,
* or a portion of, this CFMWS HPA range. Extend the memblks
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists