lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001db4ab5$026b8b20$0742a160$@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:38:42 +0900
From: "Dujeong.lee" <dujeong.lee@...sung.com>
To: "'Eric Dumazet'" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "'Youngmin Nam'" <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>, "'Jakub Kicinski'"
	<kuba@...nel.org>, "'Neal Cardwell'" <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<horms@...nel.org>, <guo88.liu@...sung.com>, <yiwang.cai@...sung.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<joonki.min@...sung.com>, <hajun.sung@...sung.com>,
	<d7271.choe@...sung.com>, <sw.ju@...sung.com>, <iamyunsu.kim@...sung.com>,
	<kw0619.kim@...sung.com>, <hsl.lim@...sung.com>, <hanbum22.lee@...sung.com>,
	<chaemoo.lim@...sung.com>, <seungjin1.yu@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] tcp: check socket state before calling WARN_ON

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 7:21 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:16 AM Dujeong.lee <dujeong.lee@...sung.com>
> wrote:
> >
> 
> > Thanks for all the details on packetdrill and we are also exploring
> USENIX 2013 material.
> > I have one question. The issue happens when DUT receives TCP ack with
> large delay from network, e.g., 28seconds since last Tx. Is packetdrill
> able to emulate this network delay (or congestion) in script level?
> 
> Yes, the packetdrill scripts can wait an arbitrary amount of time between
> each event
> 
> +28 <next event>
> 
> 28 seconds seems okay. If the issue was triggered after 4 days,
> packetdrill would be impractical ;)

Hi all,

We secured new ramdump.
Please find the below values with TCP header details.

tp->packets_out = 0
tp->sacked_out = 0
tp->lost_out = 1
tp->retrans_out = 1
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok = 5 (tcp_is_sack(tp))
tp->mss_cache = 1400
((struct inet_connection_sock *)sk)->icsk_ca_state = 4
((struct inet_connection_sock *)sk)->icsk_pmtu_cookie = 1500

Hex from ip header:
45 00 00 40 75 40 00 00 39 06 91 13 8E FB 2A CA C0 A8 00 F7 01 BB A7 CC 51 F8 63 CC 52 59 6D A6 B0 10 04 04 77 76 00 00 01 01 08 0A 89 72 C8 42 62 F5 F5 D1 01 01 05 0A 52 59 6D A5 52 59 6D A6

Transmission Control Protocol
Source Port: 443
Destination Port: 42956
TCP Segment Len: 0
Sequence Number (raw): 1375232972
Acknowledgment number (raw): 1381592486
1011 .... = Header Length: 44 bytes (11)
Flags: 0x010 (ACK)
Window: 1028
Calculated window size: 1028
Urgent Pointer: 0
Options: (24 bytes), No-Operation (NOP), No-Operation (NOP), Timestamps, No-Operation (NOP), No-Operation (NOP), SACK

If anyone wants to check other values, please feel free to ask me

Thanks,
Dujeong.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ