lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUb-tpmTiKV5BFopCWoY96D_HYNG60Kv+wVRKnDFF+COA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 08:52:08 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, 
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] staging: gpib: Fix i386 build issue

Hi Günter,

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 5:18 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> The underlying problem is that the code uses a pointer to store the physical
> address. That doesn't work if sizeof(pointer) < sizeof(physical address),
> which affects systems with X86_PAE enabled. I have not seen the problem
> anywhere else.

I could reproduce the build issue on ARM, with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y,
which is not enabled by allmodconfig.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ