linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: apple,dwi-bl: Add bindings for Apple DWI backlight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <okhsrlpr6qu6crzzhqzbvgwoqwcxefynceje6pyttb3x57vrsf@hyilj6xo23t7>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:31:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Nick Chan <towinchenmi@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>, 
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, 
	Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, 
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: apple,dwi-bl: Add
 bindings for Apple DWI backlight

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 03:58:33PM +0800, Nick Chan wrote:
> Add the device tree bindings for backlight controllers attached via Apple
> DWI 2-wire interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Chan <towinchenmi@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/leds/backlight/apple,dwi-bl.yaml | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/apple,dwi-bl.yaml
> 

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof