lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d23ccf9-3420-45bf-aac7-5c1a075e031f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:44:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Karl Li (李智嘉) <Karl.Li@...iatek.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: Chungying Lu (呂忠穎) <Chungying.Lu@...iatek.com>,
 Andy Teng (鄧如宏) <Andy.Teng@...iatek.com>,
 Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
 <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 Chien-Chih Tseng (曾建智)
 <Chien-Chih.Tseng@...iatek.com>,
 "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "wenst@...omium.org" <wenst@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mailbox: mediatek: Add mtk-apu-mailbox driver

On 05/12/2024 08:32, Karl Li (李智嘉) wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-12-05 at 07:05 +0000, Karl Li (李智嘉) wrote:
>> Dead maintainers,
> "Dear" maintainers. Really sorry for the typo...
>>
>> I hope you're doing well. Just a warm reminder that we're following
>> up
>> on these patch and really appreciate any feedback you might have.
>>

You received like 6 or 7 reviews/replies for your patchset. What are you
implying here if feedback was not enough?

Respond and implement the feedback instead ignoring it.

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ