lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33c61b28-c0b8-478d-8107-c6ed1ff9e466@beagleboard.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:52:22 +0530
From: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] of: overlay: Add support for export-symbols node
 feature

On 09/12/24 20:48, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At Linux Plumbers Conference 2024, we (me and Luca Ceresolli) talked
> about issues we have with runtime hotplug on non-discoverable busses
> with device tree overlays [1].
> 
> On our system, a base board has a connector and addon boards can be
> connected to this connector. Both boards are described using device
> tree. The base board is described by a base device tree and addon boards
> are describe by overlays device tree. More details can be found at [2].
> 
> This kind of use case can be found also on:
>    - Grove Sunlight Sensor [3]
>    - mikroBUS [4]
> 
> One of the issue we were facing on was referencing resources available
> on the base board device tree from the addon overlay device tree.
> 
> Using a nexus node [5] helps decoupling resources and avoid the
> knowledge of the full base board from the overlay. Indeed, with nexus
> node, the overlay need to know only about the nexus node itself.
> 
> For instance, suppose a connector where a GPIO is connected at PinA. On
> the base board this GPIO is connected to the GPIO 12 of the SoC GPIO
> controller.
> 
> The base board can describe this GPIO using a nexus node:
>      soc_gpio: gpio-controller {
>        #gpio-cells = <2>;
>      };
> 
>      connector1: connector1 {
>          /*
>           * Nexus node for the GPIO available on the connector.
>           * GPIO 0 (Pin A GPIO) is connected to GPIO 12 of the SoC gpio
>           * controller
>           */
>          #gpio-cells = <2>;
>          gpio-map = <0 0 &soc_gpio 12 0>;
>          gpio-map-mask = <0xf 0x0>;
>          gpio-map-pass-thru = <0x0 0xf>;
>      };
> 
> The connector pin A GPIO can be referenced using:
>    <&connector1 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>
> 
> This implies that the overlay needs to know about exact label that
> references the connector. This label can be different on a different
> board and so applying the overlay could failed even if it is used to
> describe the exact same addon board. Further more, a given base board
> can have several connectors where the exact same addon board can be
> connected. In that case, the same overlay cannot be used on both
> connector. Indeed, the connector labels have to be different.
> 
> The export-symbols node introduced by this current series solves this
> issue.
> 
> The idea of export-symbols is to have something similar to the global
> __symbols__ node but local to a specific node. Symbols listed in this
> export-symbols are local and visible only when an overlay is applied on
> a node having an export-symbols subnode.
> 
> Using export-symbols, our example becomes:
>      soc_gpio: gpio-controller {
>        #gpio-cells = <2>;
>      };
> 
>      connector1: connector1 {
>          /*
>           * Nexus node for the GPIO available on the connector.
>           * GPIO 0 (Pin A GPIO) is connected to GPIO 12 of the SoC gpio
>           * controller
>           */
>          #gpio-cells = <2>;
>          gpio-map = <0 0 &soc_gpio 12 0>;
>          gpio-map-mask = <0xf 0x0>;
>          gpio-map-pass-thru = <0x0 0xf>;
> 
>          export-symbols {
>            connector = <&connector1>;
>          };
>      };
> 
> With that export-symbols node, an overlay applied on connector1 node can
> have the symbol named 'connector' resolved to connector1. Indeed, the
> export-symbols node available at connector1 node is used when the
> overlay is applied. If the overlay has an unresolved 'connector' symbol,
> it will be resolved to connector1 thanks to export-symbols.
> 
> Our overlay using the nexus node can contains:
>     node {
>        foo-gpio = <&connector 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>     };
> It used the GPIO 0 from the connector it is applied on.
> 
> A board with two connectors can be described with:
>      connector1: connector1 {
>          ...
>          export-symbols {
>            connector = <&connector1>;
>          };
>      };
> 
>      connector2: connector2 {
>          ...
>          export-symbols {
>            connector = <&connector2>;
>          };
>      };
> 
> In that case, the same overlay with unresolved 'connector' symbol can be
> applied on both connectors and the correct symbol resolution (connector1
> or connector2) will be done.

What is the reason for not using symbols directly as described here [3]?

I do like this approach since it does not pollute the global symbols. 
Just want to know if there are any other reasons for it.

> 
> This current series add support for the export-symbols node feature:
>    - Patch 1 describes the export-symbols binding
>    - Patches 2 to 6 prepare and add the support for the export-symbols
>      feature
>    - Patch 7 adds an unittest for the export-symbols feature
> 
> Best regards,
> Hervé
> 
> [1] https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1696/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240917-hotplug-drm-bridge-v4-0-bc4dfee61be6@bootlin.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240702164403.29067-1-afd@ti.com/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240627-mikrobus-scratch-spi-v5-0-9e6c148bf5f0@beagleboard.org/
> [5] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/v0.4/source/chapter2-devicetree-basics.rst#nexus-nodes-and-specifier-mapping
> 
> Herve Codina (7):
>    dt-bindings: Add support for export-symbols node
>    of: resolver: Introduce get_phandle_from_symbols_node()
>    of: resolver: Add export_symbols in of_resolve_phandles() parameters
>    of: resolver: Add support for the export symbols node
>    of: overlay: Add export_symbols_name in of_overlay_fdt_apply()
>      parameters
>    of: overlay: Add support for the export symbols node
>    of: unittest: Add tests for export symbols
> 
>   .../devicetree/bindings/export-symbols.yaml   | 43 ++++++++++
>   drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.c                    |  3 +-
>   drivers/of/of_kunit_helpers.c                 |  2 +-
>   drivers/of/of_private.h                       |  2 +-
>   drivers/of/overlay.c                          | 30 ++++++-
>   drivers/of/resolver.c                         | 80 ++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile             |  5 ++
>   .../unittest-data/overlay_export_symbols.dtso | 15 ++++
>   .../of/unittest-data/testcases_common.dtsi    |  1 +
>   .../unittest-data/tests-export-symbols.dtsi   | 30 +++++++
>   drivers/of/unittest.c                         | 76 ++++++++++++++++--
>   include/linux/of.h                            |  6 +-
>   12 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/export-symbols.yaml
>   create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_export_symbols.dtso
>   create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-export-symbols.dtsi
> 


Ayush Singh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ