[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1gZrEbqzbf01WhE@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:36:28 +0100
From: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panic: remove spurious empty line to clean warning
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:10:31AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:05 AM Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > You can merge it through rust-fixes. I have another patch [1] under
> > review that touches this file, but it shouldn't conflict, as the changes
> > are far from this line.
>
> Sounds good, thanks! (But of course please feel free to merge fixes through DRM)
Yeah I think once rust lands in drm the patches should land through drm
trees, or we'll have a bit of a mess. Of course with rust expert
reviews/acks where needed.
-Sima
> > How do you test clippy, so I can check I won't introduce another warning
> > with this series?
>
> With `CLIPPY=1`, please see:
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/rust/general-information.html#extra-lints
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
--
Simona Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists